микрозайм срочно на банковскую карту микрокредит спб взять кредит микрокредит онлайн микрокредит на карту онлайн срочный микрокредит онлайн микрозайм онлайн заявка займ кредит микрокредиты онлайн срочно займ онлайн на карту круглосуточно

The Shoe Is On The Other Foot? April 30, 2014

A United Church of Christ is, it seems, suing the state of North Carolina because its ‘religious liberty’ is being denied because it cannot pronounce a same sex couple married under state law.  The UCC should have the right, I believe, to declare ‘holy matrimony’ [as distinct from civil marriage] under its own canon law.  And on the other hand, so should we Christians.  [Despite its name, I do not consider the United Church of Christ a Christian denomination nowadays.  Yes, it’s judgmental, but it’s the kind of judgment we are supposed to make.]

I’ll go a step further and clarify.  It is not heretical for a Christian to support ‘marriage equality’ at civil law.  A Christian could have without heresy voted against Proposition 8, for example, though I supported it.  It is heretical for a Christian to advocate that his church recognize same sex couples in its canon law, much less perform ceremonies.  The church needs to have a different ‘definition of marriage’ than the state.  Frankly, it should have had this for 40 years, since ‘no-fault divorce’ came in.  This would even be true in North Carolina, because, I trust, the civil marriage laws of North Carolina allow for no-fault divorce.  The state of North Carolina should allow its churches to define ‘holy matrimony’ as they see fit and not require a marriage license; and they should define ‘civil marriage’ as the people of the State see fit and require that a justice of the peace, not any religious officer, ‘solemnize’ or make legal these licensed civil marriages.  And California and states that have ‘civil marriage equality’ should do the same.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.